SCI论文投稿指南4-Response(修改稿回答审稿人)

二当家最近投了一篇二区的SCI,说实话开始报的希望并不大,五五开吧。另我感到意外的是三个审稿专家都表示我论文的

ideal 很有趣 (他们一般说interesting)。而且,最后编辑总结的话是( three reviews all indicating potential of your work),让我心花怒放。

但当我看到三个专家的审稿意见时,心底又一阵凉意袭来,大大小小一共30多条意见,尤其是其中一位专家就提了将近20条意见。没有办法,我首先把每个审稿专家的意见先粗略地浏览一遍。然后针对每个提问,仔细思考该如何回答,不能回答的又该怎么办。

一般情况下,只要仔细认真回答每个专家的问题录用的可能性是比较高的。因为,如果你的文章不行,编辑部不会花那么大的功夫给你总结、送审的。同时,最好不要反驳专家,除非你有铁证!就算有铁证,也得慎重!

在此,二当家又总结了一下论文修改稿回复专家的Response,希望对科研筒子们有所帮助。最后,祝自己好运吧!


List of Responses

Dear Editors and Reviewers:

Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers' comments concerning our manuscript entitled 'Paper Title' (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer's comments are as flowing:

Responds to the reviewer’s comments:

Reviewer #1:

1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)

Response: ××××××

2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)

Response: ××××××

。。。。。。

逐条意见回答,切忌一定不能有遗漏

针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用:

We are very sorry for our negligence of ………

We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ………

It is really true as Reviewer suggested that……

We have made correction according to the Reviewer’s comments.

We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer’s suggestion

As Reviewer suggested that……

Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have ……

最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见:

Special thanks to you for your good comments.

Reviewer #2:

同上述

Reviewer #3:

××××××

Other changes:

1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……” were corrected as “…………”

2. Line 107, “……” was added

3. Line 129, “……” was deleted

××××××

We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper.

We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers' warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.

Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.

SCI论文投稿指南4-Response(修改稿回答审稿人)


分享到:


相關文章: