PS和AE的對決！英特爾VS AMD VS 蘋果電腦。Photoshop and Ae's Epic Battle! Intel Vs AMD Vs Mac
如果你在尋找新的PS電腦，也許你會覺得目前市場上能選擇的配件太多了。即使你只想買個CPU，你也會覺得很難找到性價比高的。
Finding the right CPU for your new workstation can be a confusing and hard quest. There are so many options and not much real true data to help guide most users towards the correct choice.
在這篇文章中，我們將進行英特爾與AMD處理器的對比，包含the Intel 9th Gen, Intel X-series, AMD Ryzen 2nd Gen, and AMD Threadripper 2nd Gen CPU lineups，另外，我們也將他們與Mac Pro 12 Core and iMac Pro 14 Core進行對比。
The MyEinn PC team did a benchmark of a wide range of processors from Intel/AMD and compared them to a current Mac Pro 12 Core and iMac Pro 14 Core.
Copyright © 2018 MYEINN HK LIMITED
Methodology
測試設置與方法
此測試使用Photoshop CC 2019 (ver. 20.0.0)與18.10，主要對比打開/保存，調整尺寸，content aware fill等主要任務，濾鏡，全景拼接。
For the testing itself, we will be using Photoshop CC 2019 version 18.10. This benchmark tests a range of general tasks (open/save, resize, content aware fill, etc.), filters, and photo merge.
Analysis
結果分析
Higher is Better Copyright © 2018 MYEINN HK LIMITE
PS基準測試範圍，我們分成4個部分：主要任務，濾鏡，圖片拼接以及CPU加速。除了圖片拼接之外，我們也測試了其他每項在8 bits/channel 與16 bits/channel模式下的結果。所有測試結果會在總結中顯示。
The Core i9 9900K and Core i7 9700K are the top performers in the Ps 2019 benchmark - which is to be expected, since Photoshop is not optimized for larger core count CPUs. This means that a CPU that has a higher clock speed (Mhz) but a smaller amount of cres will perform the best. Placing next in the benchmark is the iMac Pro 14 Core, which is not a surprise. The Intel X-series processors, which were recently released, all fall behind the iMac with a very close score between the bunch of them. These X-series CPUs (which are much more expensive) are around 10-15% slower than the Intel Core i9 9900K.
根據測試結果總結，可以看到Intel 9th Gen CPUs，the Core i9 9900K與Core i7 9700K表現優異，這也是意料中的結果，因為PS不會明顯受到高核心計數的影響。其次是the iMac Pro 14 Core，接下來是最近新出的Intel X系列，Intel X系列的CPU相比i9 9900K要慢10-15%
The AMD Ryzen 7 and the AMD Threadripper CPUs all tested behind the Intel- X series. Here we do see some unexpected results, where the lower-end Threadripper CPUs are only about 20% slower than the i9 9900K, while the two more expensive "WX" series models are closer to 27% slower. This is most likely caused by the design of the WX series. They (in laymen terms) are designed as two CPU cores crammed into one slot. This causes some overhead issues when programs are not optimized for higher core count CPUs. AMD has tried to counter this known issue with a "Dynamic Local Mode," but the results are still the same.
緊接著Intel X-series的是AMD Ryzen 7 and the AMD Threadripper CPUs，有趣的是，相對低端的Threadripper CPUs僅僅比i9 9900K慢了20%，兩個"WX"系列的慢了將近27%，即使開通了"Dynamic Local Mode"功能，WX models還有些表現問題。
The Mac Pro is about 30% slower than the i9 9900K, which is not a surprising result considering its CPU.
在每個測試的最後一欄都是Mac Pro，相比i9 9900K慢了30%
Our Conclusion for the Intel vs AMD vs Mac Photoshop CC 2019 Benchmark:
在Photoshop CC 2019中，毫無疑問，Intel 9th Gen CPUs是目前市場速度最快的處理器。即使你多花費50%以上使用Intel X-series CPU，或花費兩倍使用iMac Pro，i9 9900K還是相對比價快7-15%
Just as last year, there can be no question that the consumer level Intel CPU is the king of Photoshop 2019. Even with a 50% higher investment into a Intel X-series CPU, or even more if you go Mac, you are only throwing money down a Ps designed drain. The reason for this is the incredible single core speed of the new 9th gen Intel CPUs. Even the most expensive Mac is around 9-15% slower than the much cheaper i9 9900K based workstation.
與AMD Threadripper system對比，差距更大。i9 9900K相對比較快20%到30%，AMD Ryzen 7 2700X物有所值，比Intel Core i5 9600K貴一點，速度也快了幾個百分點。意思是如果你的預算是買一個價值2100 RMB的CPU，在使用PS是，看不到英特爾與AMD的差距。
The performance gap between the Core i9 and the AMD Threadripper system is even larger. The Core i9 9900K is 20% to 30% faster in our Photoshop 2019 benchmarks. However, the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, even though it doesn't top the charts, for its price is just right. It is a tiny bit more expensive than the Intel Core i5 9600K at the current market price, but is faster by a few percent. This means that if your budget can only handle a 2,100 RMB investment in a CPU, you won't see much of a difference between an Intel and AMD workstation while using Photoshop 2019.
After Effects CC 2019
The next benchmark we had for our wide range of CPUs and Mac computers was After Effects CC 2019.
在這部分測試對比中，對比了英特爾與AMD處理器，包含the Intel 9th Gen, Intel X-series, AMD Ryzen 2nd Gen, and AMD Threadripper 2nd Gen CPU lines，另外，我們也將他們與Mac Pro 12 Core and iMac Pro 14 Core進行對比。（蘋果粉絲們注意了 開戰的時候到了）
Benchmark Results
Analysis
結果分析
Copyright © 2018 MYEINN HK LIMITED
After Effects對比測試主要測試內存預覽，最終渲染，跟蹤。
根據測試結果，Intel 9th Gen CPUs，the Core i9 9900K，Core i7 9700K表現優異，即使他們價格少於Intel X-series or AMD Threadripper CPUs，這是意料之中的結果，因為After Effects只用少數的CPU核心計數。
Once again, we see that the Intel 9th Gen CPUs (Core i9 9900K and Core i7 9700K) are currently the top performers, even though they are much less expensive than the Intel X-series or AMD Threadripper CPUs. This is, again, to be expected since most of After Effects coding is only able to use a finite amount of CPU cores. This means that a higher Mhz core speed will be better for Ae when compared to a lager amount of cores.
根據測試結果，Intel 9th Gen CPUs，the Core i9 9900K，Core i7 9700K表現優異，即使他們價格少於Intel X-series or AMD Threadripper CPUs，這是意料之中的結果，因為After Effects只用少數的CPU核心計數。
In fact, the X-series CPUs are around 6-20% slower than the Intel Core i9 9900K, depending on which model you choose. With this in mind however, a big advantage of the Intel X-series CPUs is that they support up to 128GB of RAM! This advantage doesn't effect our benchmark because our projects are too small (anyone want to donate a larger project?) to take advantage of the larger amount of memory. However, If your projects tend to be very complex and you rely on RAM Preview caching, then you may want to use an X-series CPU to get the higher RAM capacity.
緊接著Intel 9th Gen，是最近新出的Intel X系列。X-series CPUs相比Intel Core i9 9900K慢6-20%，取決於使用哪個X-series CPU，X-series CPU的優點是他們能最大支持128GB的RAM, Intel 9th Gen CPU只能最大支持64GB的RAM,這個並沒有在測試結果中顯示，如果你需要更高的RAM內存去做更復雜的工作，就可以選擇X-series CPU
The iMac Pro 14 core, AMD Threadripper, and AMD Ryzen 2700X are all 25% slower than the Intel Core i9 9900K. The Mac Pro which is about 40% slower than the i9 9900K.
在Intel X-series are下面，是the iMac Pro 14 core, AMD Threadripper, and AMD Ryzen 2700X，他們都比Intel Core i9 9900K慢約25%，在每個表格的最後一欄是Mac Pro，比 i9 9900K慢約40%，所以配置 i9 9900K的電腦差不多比價格較高的Mac Pro快兩倍。
Our Conclusion for the Intel vs AMD vs Mac After Effects CC 2019 Benchmark
Intel's 9th Gen CPUs are currently the kings of Ae. The Intel X-series are anywhere from 6-20% slower than the i9 9900K, but will be better for those of you who have massive models and projects.
在After Effects CC 2019中，Intel 9th Gen CPUs 與i9 9900K是目前最快的處理器，Intel X-series緊隨其後，相比i9 9900K慢約6-20%，取決於使用哪個Intel X-series CPU, 儘管如此，Intel X-series CPU比Intel 9th Gen CPUs支持更高的RAM內存。
In this benchmark, AMD workstations fell short and even at a lower price, the performance gap between the cheaper Intel i5 9th gen and the AMD chips mean buying a workstation for Ae will have to be Intel based this year. The iMac Pro and Mac Pro are all well behind an Intel-based PC. The iMac Pro will cost 2 times as much as an i9-9900K workstation and be more than 20% slower!
相比英特爾的CPU，AMD暫時落後。如果你要找表現最好或性價比高的，適合After Effects的，推薦使用英特爾CPU，相對配置i9 9900K 的電腦，iMac Pro and Mac Pro的表現比較弱。在測試中，iMac Pro 14 core相對慢約20%，但價格約是兩倍高。即使使用X-series CPU，iMac Pro依然相對慢約15%，但價格約高25%。
閱讀更多 買易贏科技 的文章
