TASK 1
题目：办公室内不同办公活动的时间占比
类型：饼图/动态图
考点/写作要点：
1. 注意改写题目，1980到2000刚好二十年的时间，可以变为two decades.
2. 动态图要注意数据的上升/下降/不变的趋势;
3. 时态：过去时, 过去完成时;
4. 一直到2000年才出现了用Email沟通交流的方式;
5. 变化最大的是电脑的使用时间占比，从2%上升到了30%，并且在2000成为最受欢迎的办公方式之一;
6. 电话和书面档案(paper document)的使用时间下降;
7. 面对面交流这个办公方式使用时间没有变化;
The two pie charts give information about how much time was spent on activities in an American office over two decades (1980-2000).
It is clear that in 1980, the most popular activities in the office was to phone other people, accounted for around 30%. Followed by using paper document, took up of 20% of the total percentage. Meanwhile, using computer was the lowest, only 2% of workers prefer this method. The ratio of face-to-face communication, meeting and other activities were similar, accounted for 14%, 19% and 15% respectively.
There had been some changes in the ways of working in 2000. One of the major differences was that people started to use email to communicate at work, which made up of 8%. Also, the time spent on computers took up the highest proportion (30%). Meanwhile, holding meetings became the least popular for employees (6%). The rate of paper document decreased by half, while the proportion of other activities and talking stayed constant.
Overall, it can be seen from the chart that instead of the traditional approach such as using paper document or face-to-face meetings, the use of technology had been adopted by many office workers.
(194 words)
Task 2 类型 环保类
题目：
Some people think that a huge of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that money is better spent on human population。
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
范文解析:
本题讨论政府资金是应该投入到动物保护，还是花在人民生活水平的提高上。四段式或者是五段式都是可以，建议大家要多熟悉基本的议论文写作结构，同时注意亮明观点，同意替换，本文四段。
文章结构
P1：引入话题+亮明观点;
P2：反驳观点一：单纯花钱在动物保护是没有用的，提出其他的方法;
P3：指出为什么同意观点二：改善人们的生活，同时也可以根本上解决动物濒危的问题;
高分话题表达:
Coexist 共存
Interdependent 相互依存的
Disparity 差距
By no way 绝不
biota 生物圈
Scheme 措施
Mockery 嘲笑
Introduce 制定
Plague 困扰
Meagre 微薄的
高分结构：
In a way that… 状语从句
What next should be mentioned.. 主语从句
Lies in a fact that 概括性同位语
Without….. 条件状语
While…..,……. 状语从句 对比
If it should be 插入语 补充
As the two species coexisting on this planet, human beings and animals are interdependent parts regardless of the disparity in intelligence and nature. Under this circumstance, while animals keep on feeding each other some humans start to consider animal rights and advocate distributing funds towards its protection. In my view, I cannot agree with this to any extent.
Above all, funding any campaigns of animal protection is by no way the feasible solution to the illegal hunting and improving the harsh situations of wildlife conservation. In this respect, this kind of investment can only protect some specific species drawn people’s attention, such as panda and koala, whereas most other varieties that we lose sight of but serve important roles in balancing the biotas cannot be benefited from this scheme, which is would be a mockery to all the s made by animal activists and environmentalists in a sense. Consequently, rather than pouring large portions of revenue, raising the awareness by publicity and introducing laws may be superiorities in the current days with better and more satisfying outcomes in a long term.
What next should be mentioned is the urgencies plaguing human populations should be given first priority to. From one , despite the advancement in technology and rise in the living standard in metropolitan areas, still many people are stuck in poverty struggling for daily meals and being racked by rather meagre payment. Compared with worrying about extinction of animals, humanitarianism lies in this fact in a more reasonable way, if it should be. In another aspect, this practice also contributes to alleviating poaching as many valuable and endangered animals are killed and sold to make a living and survive by civilians living in the primitive mountains and remote areas where they have no choice.
In conclusion, I firmly believe receipts should be allocated to poverty-relief of people in the underdeveloped nations and regions instead of doing some superficial work in preservation of animals. Without the improvement of cognition and living standard, money would be ly wasted and harmony is always a word between humanity and wildlife.
閱讀更多 9分雅思姐 的文章
