Euro NCAP——L2自動駕駛測試系列之二:奔馳、特斯拉、DS

看視頻的朋友移步wx號:AI汽車人

3——Mercedes-Benz C-Class

Euro NCAP——L2自動駕駛測試系列之二:奔馳、特斯拉、DS

視頻:

測試結果:

Euro NCAP——L2自動駕駛測試系列之二:奔馳、特斯拉、DS


奔馳C級表現良好,系統和駕駛員平衡較好

在測試的場景中,自適應輔助系統對前方靜止車輛作出直接響應,AEB/FCW系統可以支持ACC達到評估的最大速度70公里/小時。在較慢的移動和制動領先的車輛方案,汽車也反應良好,並提供全面的支持,通過測試速度範圍。在快速變化的條件下,切入和切出兩種關鍵的、具有挑戰性的情況下,ACC反應很晚或沒有出現。在這些情況下,很晚或沒有發出警告來提醒司機可能發生的撞車事故。

總體而言,該系統在ACC場景中表現良好,並且在汽車和駕駛員之間存在良好的平衡。司機顯然需要保持警惕,並在更緊急的日常情況下采取適當的行動,比如突然停車的情況

原文:

In the scenarios tested, Adaptive Distance Assist DISTRONIC responds to a stationary vehicle directly ahead and the ACC function will bring the car to a halt up to 70 km/h after which the AEB/FCW system keeps supporting the driver up to the maximum speed assessed. In both the slower-moving and braking lead vehicle scenarios, the car also responds well and provides full support across the test speed range. Very late or no ACC response was witnessed in the cut-in and cut-out scenarios which are critical and challen-ging due to the rapidly changing conditions. Very late or no warning was issued to alert the driver of the possible crash in these cases.

Overall the system performs well in the ACC scenarios and a good balance exists between the car and the driver. The driver clearly needs to stay alert and take appropriate action in more critical day-to-day scenarios such as the sudden cut-in situation


4——Tesla Model S

Euro NCAP——L2自動駕駛測試系列之二:奔馳、特斯拉、DS


Euro NCAP——L2自動駕駛測試系列之二:奔馳、特斯拉、DS

Model S系統很強大啊,很容易是駕駛員產生依賴性,需要保持警惕!

在測試的場景中,巡航控制響應前方的靜止車輛,ACC功能將使車輛在評估的最大速度下停止。在低速行駛和制動的情況下,車輛也能很好地響應,並在測試速度範圍內提供充分的支持。由於快速變化的條件,在關鍵和具有挑戰性的插入和斷開場景中,觀察到非常晚或沒有系統響應。在這些情況下,很晚或沒有發出警告來提醒司機可能發生的撞車事故。

總的來說,系統在ACC場景中表現良好,但是由於車輛主要在全速測試前處於控制狀態(特別是在平穩車輛場景中),系統中存在過度依賴的固有風險。司機顯然需要保持警惕,並在更關鍵的日常場景中採取適當的行動,例如突然插入或斷開的情況

原文:

In the scenarios tested, Traffic Aware Cruise Control responds to a stationary vehicle directly ahead and the ACC function will bring

the vehicle to a halt up to the maximum speed assessed. In both the slower moving and braking lead vehicle scenarios, the vehicle

also responds well and provides full support across the test speed range. Very late or no system response was witnessed in the cut-

in and cut-out scenarios which are critical and challenging due to the rapidly changing conditions. Very late or no warning was issued

to alert the driver of the possible crash in these cases.

Overall, the system performs well in the ACC scenarios, but as the vehicle is primarily in control up to the full speed tested (especially

in the stationary vehicle scenario) there is an inherent risk of over-reliance in the system. The driver clearly needs to stay alert and

take appropriate action in more critical day-to-day scenarios such as the sudden cut-in or cut-out situations

5——DS 7 Crossback

Euro NCAP——L2自動駕駛測試系列之二:奔馳、特斯拉、DS

Euro NCAP——L2自動駕駛測試系列之二:奔馳、特斯拉、DS


DS 7的功能相對薄弱,有待加強!

在測試的場景中,系統不會直接對前方的靜止車輛做出反應。AEB/FCW系統僅支持最多80公里/小時的速度。在慢速行駛和制動兩種情況下,車輛都有響應,但不提供充分的支持,需要系統的緊急干預來避免或進一步減輕碰撞。由於快速變化的條件,在臨界和極具挑戰性的切入和切出情況下,觀察到非常晚或沒有ACC反應。在這些情況下,系統很晚或沒有發出警告來提醒司機可能發生的撞車事故。

總的來說,ACC系統提供了有限的支持,在所有場景中,駕駛員都必須主要保持控制車輛。

原文:

In the scenarios tested, Connected Pilot does not respond to a stationary vehicle directly ahead. The AEB/FCW system supports the driver only up to a speed of 80 km/h. In both the slower-moving and braking lead vehicle scenarios, the car responds but does not provide full support and emergency intervention by the system is required to avoid or further mitigate the collision. Very late or no。ACC response was witnessed in the cut-in and cut-out scenarios which are critical and challenging scenarios due to the rapidly chan-ging conditions. Very late or no warning was issued to alert the driver of the possible crash in these cases.

Overall the ACC system provides limited support and the driver has to stay primarily in control in all scenarios.


分享到:


相關文章: